Warwickshire County Council: public health transformation six years on

This case study shows the excellent work that public health in local government is doing to commission for quality and best value across all areas.

View allPublic health articles

Overview

Warwickshire County Council lies in the West Midlands and has a population of around 560,000 people. The county is largely rural, with a number of urban areas based around towns such as Rugby, Warwick, Stratford-upon- Avon and Nuneaton. Warwickshire is one of the 20 per cent least deprived council areas in England, with life expectancy for both men and women higher than the national average. However around 12 per cent of children live in low-income families and there are areas of deprivation and health inequalities, particularly in the north of the county.

Organisation

When it moved to the county council, public health took on additional responsibilities for advocacy and Local Healthwatch. More recently the DPH became Head of Service for Public Health and Strategic Commissioning – responsible for commissioning public health, adult social care and children’s social care services, and leading Warwickshire’s Strategic Commissioning Unit. This has brought many opportunities to directly shape, rather than influence, services for adults and children so they are focused on health and wellbeing. The ethos of the unit has three key themes: prevention, early intervention and promoting self-help. Warwickshire Public Health has an emphasis on commissioning services – 87 per cent of services are commissioned, particularly from the NHS and the voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. Public health consultants and commissioners are embedded across three commissioning teams – children, older people, and disabilities – which includes mental wellbeing and dementia.

Partnerships and priorities

The contribution of boroughs and districts to public health is seen as fundamental and there has been a great effort to engage with these councils, including through small grants schemes. The DPH sees himself as DPH for each borough and district. The councils have representatives on Warwickshire Health and Wellbeing Board (HWB) and the Place Board (below) and meet regularly with the portfolio holder for adult social care and health and the DPH. Warwickshire HWB has three overarching priorities:

  • promote independence
  • community resilience
  • integration and working together across the system.

The STP – Better Care, Better Health Better Value – covers Coventry City Council and Warwickshire, and the DsPH are co-leads of the Preventative and Proactive workstream. Coventry and Warwickshire HWBs have formed a joint Place Forum which considers system-wide activity relating to health and care integration and prevention.

Forum partners have agreed an Alliance Concordat setting out principles and priorities for how they will work together. See case study in forthcoming LGA report on HWBs working together in the new NHS landscape.

Warwickshire JSNA has been revised to take on a place-based approach focused on 22 geographic areas with a population of between 30,000 and 50,000. Each area will have a detailed needs profile incorporating the views of local communities. The JSNA will support the work of districts and boroughs and system-wide integration and prevention. A Health, Wellbeing and Integrated Care Partnership has been operating in Warwickshire North since 2012. The partnership involves county and district councils, the NHS, the VCSE sector and other partners, and has a local health and wellbeing strategy and an outcomes framework. The partnership has been widened to include local NHS providers and is now looking to how it might form one element of the future ICS – integrated local teams combining to deliver primary, community and wellbeing support in local hubs. The teams would encompass social prescribing, home care, the frailty pathway, MECC, community development and wellbeing initiatives such as tackling teenage pregnancy. Similar models have now been developed across the rest of the county – Rugby and South Warwickshire. These partnerships are sub-committees of the HWB.

Coventry and Warwickshire Place System Design

 

Challenges and impact of budget reductions

The DPH’s wide commissioning role brings important opportunities to place prevention at the heart of integrated services. The challenge is that managing this span of control, with a team increased from 26 to 130 people, means there is less time for the informal influence role of the DPH.

Reductions to funding are the biggest challenge – not just for public health but in the wider council and its partners. When public health transferred to the council, the grant meant that it was able to expand into areas in which it had previously had less input, such as mental wellbeing, dementia, suicide prevention and domestic violence. This is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain.

Public health has a focus on return on investment and building sound business cases for interventions and has made savings through effective commissioning. It also shares costs, for example through joint posts funded with the NHS. There is some potential for further savings, such as reducing management costs through future consolidation and re-tendering, but this will be limited.

The impact of reduced funding is likely to be an increased focus on mandated services. It is not possible to go on cutting services without impacting on quality and some clinically governed services, such as in sexual health, need to be maintained at the appropriate level.

There are many areas which public health and partners could develop or scale up with additional funding. These include extending exercise on prescription beyond a small pilot for people with cancer; further developing the health and wellbeing potential of leisure centres; and a comprehensive, joined-up offer for mental wellbeing.